Opportunity
The Provost Office at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada, issued a call through the Teaching and Learning Framework (TLF) Fund seeking proposals for initiatives to support students’ access and success. At the same time, Dr. Jane Costello, Senior Instructional Designer in the Centre for Innovation in Teaching and Learning (CITL), was in discussions with biology faculty about the learning challenges of first-year students and the potential design of modules that could be developed as support materials. A proposal to develop online biology tutorials, through collaboration between biology faculty (subject matter experts - SMEs) and CITL, was successful in acquiring funding for two years, from 2016 to 2018, from the TLF Fund.
Ruth Hickey, Manager, Learning Design and Development in CITL, stresses the design and development process used for creation of these tutorials is highly collaborative, combining subject matter expertise with learning and media design know-how. She also underlines that CITL employs an open philosophy when approaching projects such as this with a goal of creating learning resources that can be “re-purposed, re-used and inspire”.
The project team included:
- Biology Faculty (SME): Anna Rissanen, Margaret Caldwell, Piotr Trela, Sally Goddard, and Amy Todd;
- Instructional Design/Project Management: Jane Costello and Ruth Hickey;
- Graduate Student Assistant: Marshall Rodriguez; and
- CITL Media and Design: Kevin O’Leary, Geoff Waye, Jamie Chang, Mark Shallow, and Paul Hayward.
Innovation
The online tutorials address knowledge gaps resulting in low success rates and attrition of first-year biology students. Topics covered in the optional tutorials were chosen based on a student survey, pre-post-test results, faculty experience and past final exam results. Eight topics emerged as the most troublesome concepts. However, given time and funding constraints, five of them, including The Plasma Membrane, Diffusion and Osmosis, Eukaryotic Cell, Meiosis and Inheritance, and DNA to RNA to Proteins were created.
Weekly meetings between SMEs and learning and media designers were used to consider the overall design for the series, produce storyboards, and plan and review multimedia elements. Dr. Costello, as instructional designer, guided the choices and structure of the development approach and activities for the tutorials. SMEs prepared scripts for videos, activities and quizzes, and multimedia specialists designed mock-ups for review and approval by the team.>
Each tutorial has a consistent design:
- Introduction to expected learning outcomes of the tutorial;
- Explanation of concept, using animation and video;
- Interactive activities allowing students to engage with the content. These include animations, drag and drop and matching objects, self-check quizzes, and reflection questions. Immediate feedback is designed into the activities so students can monitor their progress. Each activity can be repeated as often as students wish;
- The mix of video and activities is repeated through each tutorial, relating to the troublesome concepts;
- Self-assessment quizzes can be repeated as often as the student wants; the assessment design employs the randomization features of the tool for both answers and questions in the question library, giving students a different experience with each attempt;
- Reflection questions are included based on student feedback from one of the first focus group session. The questions relate topic learning to real life experience. The SMEs prepared answers that were hidden by design; students have the opportunity to formulate an answer based on their understanding before revealing the prepared response. These questions are good preparation for the final exam; and
- Badges are awarded for each tutorial as acknowledgement of the student’s level of participation and achievement: a silver badge for viewing every page and gold for earning 100% on the self-assessment quiz.
Each complete tutorial was subject to beta-testing with focus groups and subsequent revision. For Ruth Hickey, and the team, an indication the design approach works was the declining need for revisions after the first tutorial’s testing.
The five complete tutorials were first offered as supplementary resources to first-year biology students in September 2017; in addition, the tutorials were available to students in other programs, including nursing and second-year biology. The design of the material was easily shared amongst sites within the learning management system (LMS), as faculty were taught how to add them to their course sites versus a separate tutorial site. With the professor’s encouragement, students can access the tutorials at any time and as often as they want during a semester.
Benefits and Outcomes
The assessment of effectiveness of the pilot included pre-test questions in week one of the course that were presented again as a part of the final exam (i.e. post-test). Student performance on the mid-term exam also factored into the assessment. In addition, 225 students who used the online tutorials submitted surveys that yielded qualitative data to consider. Results were compared between tutorial users and non-users in 2017, as well as to students in the 2016 class who did not have access to the tutorials.
Students (410 students) who participated in online tutorials by answering quiz questions in at least one tutorial had higher grades than those who did not participate (160 students). Overall, the 2017 cohort with access to tutorials had higher grades than the 2016 cohort who did not.
Students who used the online tutorials in 2017 reported they:
- Were more likely to have their readings done before class;
- Received more prompt written or oral feedback on their academic performance;
- Applied theories or concepts to practical problems or in a new situation more often; and
- Took notes in class more often.
Comments from the students reflected their valuing of the tutorials:
- These are great! Why aren't they available for all the topics on the course?;
- …liked the active learning - activities, quizzes, drag and drop etc., and the fact that they were not being assessed and I could use them as often as I needed to be comfortable with the material!; and
- It makes sense now! (RE: osmosis tutorial).
Students agreed, in survey responses and focus groups, that course content was easy to find, concepts made sense, tutorials were easy to follow, and the website was pleasing to the eye.
Faculty offered personal reflections during development and at the end of the pilot semester:
- From my perspective, I have enjoyed this process from start to where we are now! Working with CITL has been interesting and fun. I learned such a lot about the process of taking ideas and turning them into videos, activities and quizzes, and the work was so collegial at every step of the way. Listening to the students on Friday telling me how they found the tutorials helpful was the icing on the cake!!
- I particularly enjoyed the team work involved in collaborating with the other biology professors and the CITL team members. I found our meetings were professional and productive. I enjoyed our critiquing of each others’ work, and I liked the way we all respected each others’ ideas and suggestions. The technical side of creating the tutorials such as storyboarding, and making the animations was all new to me, and I learned so much. It was fun doing the voice-overs as well.
For the Memorial University community, a course shell containing the tutorials is available so they can be copied into any course’s site within the LMS. This includes the full tutorial, with self-assessment quizzes and reflective questions. Transferability of the tutorials, as well as their design and structure, was an essential guideline for development from the beginning of the process.>
The media objects of each tutorial are available through Linney, the learning object repository at Memorial University, by searching under Biology. The more than 80 learning objects are available under Creative Commons licensing as open educational resources (OER) to be freely used anywhere in the world.
For staff in CITL, developing these tutorials offers learning designers wider experience and perspectives applicable to on-campus learning. The media specialist and producer also benefit from being integral throughout the process, broadening their scope of skills and knowledge. The graduate assistant, hired specifically for this project, benefits from engagement in numerous aspects of the project, including focus groups, data collection and analysis, literature, and clear presentation of content for instruction. Her input, as a non-biologist, was particularly useful in reviewing clarity and simplicity of the content and activities for beginning students.
Challenges and Enhancements
Faculty members were challenged at the beginning of the process by the amount of time it took and the need for new skills such as storyboarding. The storyboarding process pushed faculty into providing the detail of each concept needed for those having trouble comprehending it. They recognized this as not watering down academic rigour but supporting students to be more successful
Once the first tutorial was complete, the process was easier and faster. The design team provided clarification and support on storyboarding and other tasks to facilitate learning and tutorial development.
Limiting the scope of tutorials offered a challenge, as many more resources could have been developed to illustrate and expand each topic. But limits of time and access to resources required the team to pay close attention to key concepts and focus on addressing specific troublesome concepts.
As students became aware of (and fans of) the tutorials, there was increased pressure to create more and expand the question bank. While the team agreed, choices were made during the project to respect the limits on resources and timelines associated with the funding.
Potential
Funding was extended to support the development of three more tutorials. They are currently in development with the goal of availability for students in September 2019. One of them is an introduction to being in a lab, which will be useful across programs of study, as research shows that first-year students are often insecure about being in a lab, a major requirement for many programs.
In Spring 2019, all biology learning objects developed for the tutorials will be available on the Biology department website so any student can use them for content review.
Demonstrating the biology tutorials to other science faculty greatly increased interest in the approach for use in other disciplines. Ruth Hickey describes the design approach of CITL as supporting the ability to repurpose and share. Accordingly, all tutorials and multimedia assets are developed employing templates which can be repurposed in creating new resources.
For Further Information
Ruth Hickey
Manager, Learning Design and Development
Centre for Innovation in Teaching and Learning
Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
[email protected]
Jane Costello
Senior Instructional Designer
Centre for Innovation in Teaching and Learning
Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
[email protected]